2008 NL All Star Team
Well, in lieu of the Sweepers becoming the Sweepees over the weekend, I choose instead to focus on my picks for the 2008 National League All Star Team. Who wants to talk about Aramis getting pitched inside all series, going 0 for 14 (oops) and then going off to the DR to take care of serious family issues. He'll miss the San Fran series. Now Big Z, The Reedster, A-Ram and (the DL VIP) Scott Eyre are off the Cubbies squad. Yeah, let's just talk NLAS instead. At least until Cubs-Giants tonight.
Here's the 2008 Unrestricted View NL All Star Starting Lineup:
- Brandon Webb ~P~ (Sheets, Volquez, Lincecum, Haren), Brad Lidge, (Wagner, Wood, Capps, Roush)
- Geovany Soto ~C~ (McCann, Martin)
- Lance Berkman ~1B~ (Pujols, A.Gonzalez, D.Lee, Teixeira, Fielder)
- Chase Utley ~2B~ (Uggla, DeRosa)
- Chipper Jones ~3B~ (A.Ramirez, Wright)
- Hanley Ramirez ~SS~ (Reyes, Theriot, Guzman, Escobar)
- Pat Burrell ~LF~ (Holliday, Ludwick, Bay, Soriano, Braun, C.Lee)
- Nate McLouth ~CF~ (Beltran, Ankiel, Rowand)
- Kosuke Fukudome ~RF~ (Nady, Giles, Schumaker)
- ~DH~?? Take the 1B and LF list, make 1/2 play the field, and 1/2 just swing away. Start with Albert.
W-L | ERA | WHIP | K/BB | K/9 | BB/9 | GO/AO | IP | IP/GS | P/IP | |
Webb | 12-4 | 3.21 | 1.13 | 3.24 | 7.55 | 2.33 | 3.45 | 112.0 | 7.0 | 14.86 |
Sheets | 9-2 | 2.83 | 1.07 | 3.96 | 7.76 | 1.86 | 1.26 | 111.1 | 7.0 | 14.95 |
Volquez | 10-3 | 2.08 | 1.21 | 2.29 | 9.97 | 4.35 | 1.42 | 99.1 | 6.0 | 16.93 |
Lincecum | 9-1 | 2.38 | 1.24 | 2.65 | 9.36 | 3.53 | 1.36 | 109.2 | 6.2 | 16.09 |
Haren | 8-4 | 2.85 | 0.97 | 5.05 | 7.81 | 1.55 | 0.98 | 110.2 | 6.1 | 15.27 |
Hamels | 8-5 | 3.38 | 1.03 | 3.32 | 7.73 | 2.33 | 0.98 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 14.80 |
Santana | 7-7 | 3.01 | 1.22 | 3.22 | 8.16 | 2.53 | 1.19 | 113.2 | 6.2 | 15.70 |
Dempster | 9-3 | 3.26 | 1.18 | 2.10 | 7.37 | 3.51 | 1.50 | 105.0 | 6.0 | 16.39 |
Zambrano | 8-3 | 3.13 | 1.33 | 1.89 | 5.76 | 3.05 | 1.44 | 106.1 | 6.2 | 15.57 |
What can I say about the numbers? Look at the freeaakin' 3.45 Webby puts out there in ground ball to fly ball ratio. Wow. That'll get ya out of a jam now and again, eh?! Let's look at Volquez of Cincinatti and Lincecum of San Francisco. Yes, great numbers, but they lack the ability to go deep in games. Lots of pitches per inning, especially for Edinson, which can pretty much be linked directly to their BB/9 numbers. Why not Ryan Dempster and Carlos Zambrano? As much as I want to put 'em in there, they just don't match up with those other guys. What happened to the strikeouts for Big Z? Demp walks too many. and doesn't strikeout as many as Lincecum, so he just isn't in the top tier yet. Comeback Player of the Year? Sure. And, while the Arizona Diamondbacks have Webb and Haren, the Chicago Cubs don't look so bad with Zambrano and Dempster.
How about Kerry Wood turning out the second best NL Closer line on the season so far? He and Dempster's body-switch thang is turning out quite well. While 0.86 WHIP is righteous, but it's hard to knock down a 19 for 19, as hard as some may try.
SV/SVO | WHIP | ERA | K/BB | K/9 | BB/9 | GO/AO | P/IP | |
Lidge | 19/19 | 1.06 | 0.84 | 2.80 | 11.81 | 4.22 | 1.00 | 16.03 |
Wood | 20/24 | 0.86 | 2.43 | 5.67 | 11.29 | 1.99 | 0.84 | 14.73 |
Wagner | 18/23 | 0.94 | 1.91 | 4.75 | 10.36 | 2.18 | 0.71 | 15.15 |
Rauch | 16/21 | 0.92 | 2.55 | 6.50 | 8.29 | 1.28 | 0.61 | 15.05 |
Capps | 17/21 | 1.04 | 2.97 | 5.60 | 6.41 | 1.14 | 0.64 | 13.93 |
Valverde | 22/26 | 1.39 | 4.24 | 3.33 | 11.16 | 3.35 | 1.00 | 17.13 |
Wilson | 22/24 | 1.42 | 4.26 | 2.31 | 10.52 | 4.55 | 1.35 | 19.17 |
Just want to point out how the Save stat is inflated without the other data. The Save Leaders in the NL are Valverde and Wilson, but they are inferior in comparison to the others when you look at their actual game effectiveness. Look at their ERA, BB/9 and P/IP, and you'll see why they probably won't be on top of the silly "Save" stat anyway.
On a side note: How does the Save stat take into effect the difference between a one-, two-, and three-run lead, and the outcome henceforth? Save. It's a nice little indicator when taken in reference to the save opportunities, but it can, obviously, be misleading when taken by itself.
AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | RBI | K/BB | CS/SB | |
Soto | .284 | .371 | .517 | 13 | 47 | 1.79 | 39.4% |
McCann | .295 | .365 | .536 | 14 | 45 | 1.36 | 32.7% |
Martin | .307 | .405 | .443 | 8 | 37 | 0.87 | 26.8% |
B.Molina | .308 | .333 | .440 | 6 | 49 | 1.64 | 45.2% |
Y.Molina | .295 | .352 | .384 | 4 | 26 | 0.57 | 47.8% |
AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | RBI | K/BB | RF | FPCT | |
Berkman | .364 | .444 | .690 | 21 | 67 | 1.21 | 9.65 | .997 |
Pujols | .356 | .483 | .640 | 17 | 45 | 0.45 | 10.85 | .998 |
A.Gonzalez | .287 | .358 | .534 | 21 | 67 | 2.06 | 9.43 | .996 |
D.Lee | .295 | .358 | .505 | 15 | 51 | 1.65 | 9.03 | .990 |
Teixeira | .276 | .379 | .495 | 16 | 62 | 1.15 | 10.17 | .997 |
Fielder | .271 | .358 | .488 | 16 | 42 | 1.54 | 9.85 | .988 |
Can you believe Pujols and his 0.45 K/BB?!?!
AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | RBI | K/BB | RF | FPCT | |
Utley | .297 | .384 | .610 | 23 | 65 | 1.42 | 5.20 | .981 |
Uggla | .289 | .375 | .620 | 23 | 58 | 2.46 | 4.96 | .984 |
DeRosa | .295 | .386 | .462 | 10 | 45 | 1.57 | 4.64 | .974 |
So, yes, DeRosa is out (although his numbers are great, although obviously lacking some pop). And, you can't really lose with Utley or Uggla. But ya gotta pick someone, so this year, it's Chase Utley and his far superior 1.42 K/BB ratio (i.e. 40 less K's on the year).
AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | RBI | K/BB | RF | FPCT | |
Chipper | .394 | .485 | .630 | 16 | 46 | 0.70 | 2.74 | .954 |
A-Ram | .289 | .390 | .502 | 14 | 55 | 1.26 | 1.99 | .955 |
Is there anything else needed to be said? Yeah, Aramis has more RBI!! And David Wright deserved mention too (.285/.378/.497, 15 HR, 64 RBI). Umm, OK then, on to...
AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | RBI | K/BB | RF | FPCT | SB | |
H.Ramirez | .294 | .384 | .528 | 18 | 35 | 1.74 | 4.27 | .965 | 20 |
Reyes | .296 | .358 | .485 | 9 | 34 | 1.29 | 4.04 | .966 | 28 |
Theriot | .314 | .390 | .372 | 1 | 22 | 0.72 | 4.18 | .968 | 13 |
Guzman | .313 | .341 | .435 | 5 | 26 | 1.86 | 4.21 | .980 | 3 |
Escobar | .296 | .372 | .398 | 6 | 30 | 1.11 | 4.92 | .980 | 2 |
Tejada | .287 | .343 | .448 | 10 | 43 | 2.67 | 4.22 | .979 | 6 |
Lookin' at a 40/40 season pace for H.R. Now that's a Leadoff Hitter (paging the Fonz...).
AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | RBI | K/BB | RF | FPCT | SB | |
Burrell | .271 | .410 | .571 | 19 | 49 | 1.05 | 1.70 | 1.000 | 0 |
Holliday | .333 | .415 | .543 | 10 | 39 | 1.47 | 1.72 | .991 | 8 |
Ludwick | .285 | .362 | .574 | 16 | 56 | 2.06 | 2.34 | .993 | 4 |
Bay | .284 | .387 | .531 | 16 | 43 | 1.30 | 1.81 | .993 | 6 |
Soriano | .283 | .332 | .547 | 15 | 40 | 2.67 | 1.90 | .978 | 7 |
Braun | .287 | .322 | .552 | 20 | 58 | 4.25 | 1.95 | 1.000 | 8 |
C.Lee | .278 | .324 | .528 | 18 | 62 | 1.59 | 1.83 | .992 | 4 |
Burrell's SLG is the best, OBP and HR's second on this list. Add in the lowest K/BB and the zero errors, and you see why Burrell edges out Holliday and Ludwick in a tough race.
What about Alfonso Soriano, you ask? Well, he's at the top of the second tier, in my opinion. His low BA to OBP differential, the high 2.67 K/BB, and being the poorest fielder (by far) on the list makes that so. Sorry Fonzy, you're Fifth, at best. At least you probably make more than all of them combined.
AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | RBI | K/BB | RF | FPCT | SB | |
McLouth | .280 | .359 | .522 | 15 | 52 | 1.41 | 2.60 | 1.000 | 9 |
Beltran | .271 | .374 | .479 | 12 | 54 | 1.04 | 2.71 | .995 | 11 |
Rowand | .297 | .360 | .463 | 8 | 44 | 2.81 | 3.04 | .991 | 1 |
Ankiel | .259 | .334 | .506 | 15 | 38 | 2.03 | 2.41 | .975 | 1 |
I think you could pay McLouth 50 times for what they're payin' Carlos.
OK, now that I've got the Blue Kool-Aid out of the system, Xavier Nady deserves lots of attention. Would I hold my breath and stomp my feet if you said Nady should get the start? No, but I might give you the silent treatment for a bit.
AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | RBI | K/BB | RF | FPCT | SB | |
Fukudome | .297 | .405 | .434 | 6 | 33 | 1.04 | 2.15 | .994 | 7 |
Nady | .315 | .378 | .514 | 10 | 49 | 2.00 | 2.62 | .988 | 1 |
Giles | .300 | .399 | .438 | 5 | 28 | 0.67 | 2.09 | .982 | 1 |
Schumaker | .300 | .364 | .439 | 6 | 30 | 1.25 | 2.56 | .988 | 6 |
How about Giles 0.67 K/BB? And where'd this Schumaker come from and why did he have to end up in St. Louis?!
As far as the DH, after Pujols, really, just grab a 1B or LF.
Wow, that was a lot of work. I'm off to watch the rest of The Ted Lilly - Mark DeRosa Show!!!!
Go Cubs!! ♦Digg it ♦del.icio.us ♦Technorati ♦StumbleUpon ♦Google ♦Yahoo ♦reddit